Join us for conversations that inspire, recognize, and encourage innovation and best practices in the education profession.
Available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, and more.
Creative activities make the language the students’ own. It’s not the teacher’s language or the textbook language; it becomes the students’ own creation, something that they’ve put themselves into. And you can tell. They want to present these stories once they’ve worked on them. They consider them theirs and they’re invested in them.
– Jane Shuffelton
YEAR AT A GLANCE
Russian I
Russian IV
Jane Shuffelton teaches grades 9-12 Russian at Brighton High School in Rochester, New York. The school’s 1,240 students come from Brighton, a culturally diverse Rochester suburb that is part of the Brighton Central School District. The town’s 34,000 residents are mostly professionals. The school curriculum emphasizes college preparation and offers five foreign language courses, including Latin, French, Spanish, and German.
When designing her lessons, Ms. Shuffelton draws on the Standards and the New York State Learning Standards (see Resources). For her Russian I class, she selects topics that would interest high school students. She asks herself, What would students want to say if they talked with a Russian teenager? Students begin by talking about themselves, and then move on to broader, more worldly topics. Ms. Shuffelton likes to include issues that are important to the Russian people, such as geography and transportation.
Ms. Shuffelton also designs her Russian IV class based on student interests. At the end of the year, she gives her Russian III students an interest inventory that includes Russian history, geography, music, art, literature, and political life. The students select several topics that become the themes for Russian IV the following year.
The videotaped lesson occurred on a day when the Russian I and Russian IV students met together. Among the eleven Russian I students, five were heritage speakers and six were traditional learners. Among the nine Russian IV students, eight were native speakers and one was a heritage speaker. Ms. Shuffelton chose to focus on geography for this merged class because it was a subject that many students at both levels did not already know.
In addition to the geography content, the students learned language skills from one another. Russian I students had the opportunity to listen to native speakers, while Russian IV students were careful to speak and write accurately in order to make themselves understood. The conversations also gave traditional learners insights into Russian culture from classmates who were heritage students. Ms. Shuffelton addressed the different language levels of the students by varying the pace of her speech, as well as by paraphrasing and restating student responses. When the language became too difficult for beginning students, Ms. Shuffelton restated the information in English to keep the conversation and exchange of information flowing.