Teacher resources and professional development across the curriculum

Teacher professional development and classroom resources across the curriculum

Monthly Update sign up
Mailing List signup
Search
Follow The Annenberg Learner on LinkedIn Follow The Annenberg Learner on Facebook Follow Annenberg Learner on Twitter
MENU
Learning Math Home
Geometry Session 10: Classroom Case Studies - Grades 3-5
 
Session 10 Session 10 3-5 Part A Part B Part C Homework
 
Glossary
geometry Site Map
Session 10 Materials:
Notes
Solutions
Video

Session 10, Part B:
Developing Geometric Reasoning

In This Part: Introducing van Hiele Levels | Analyzing with van Hiele Levels

In this course, we have primarily worked across levels 2-4. You may feel that the activities we've done are not appropriate for the level of your students, and you're probably right. The goal for this session is for you to think about problems and activities that are at your students' level, and how to help them prepare for the next level of thinking.

In grades 3-5, students should be moving from working easily at level 0 through level 1. By fifth grade, they should be starting to work at level 2, thinking in more sophisticated ways.



video thumbnail
 

Video Segment
Watch this clip from Ms. Kurchian's class, and think about how both the lesson and the teacher are encouraging students to move to that next level of geometric reasoning. Note 5

If you are using a VCR, you can find this segment on the session video approximately 14 minutes and 3 seconds after the Annenberg Media logo.

 

 

Problem B1

Solution  

Where in the video do you see evidence of the following?

 

(Level 1 thinking) Students thinking about classes of shapes rather than the individual shapes in front of them. Do students seem concerned with orientation or size of the figures they use compared with the ones on the board?

 

(Level 2 thinking) "If-then" reasoning and making geometric arguments


 

Problem B2

Solution  

In Session 9, you worked on the problem of building the five Platonic solids and then arguing from the construction that only five such solids were possible. Recall your own experience in this activity as an adult mathematics learner. During the activity, when did you have to use level 2 thinking? (How did you know when to stop building with triangles and move on to other figures? How did you convince yourself that no other Platonic solids were possible?)


 

Problem B3

Solution  

a. 

What do you think were the key pieces of geometry content in this activity? What knowledge did you learn, solidify, or connect with better?

b. 

What do you think were the key thinking and reasoning skills in this activity? How did the reasoning and geometric content tie together?


 

Problem B4

Solution  

Now think about students in grades 3-5 and how the Platonic solids activity might work with them. What must students know and be comfortable with to get the most out of this activity? What are potential stumbling blocks for them?


 
 

Join the discussion! Post your answer to Problem B4 on Channel Talk; then read and respond to answers posted by others.

 
 

Problem B5

Solution  

What might students misunderstand or find confusing in the lesson? How could you alter the lesson or prepare them beforehand to help avoid these misunderstandings?


Next > Part C: Problems That Illustrate Geometric Reasoning

Learning Math Home | Geometry Home | Glossary | Map | ©

Session 10, Grades 3-5: Index | Notes | Solutions | Video

© Annenberg Foundation 2014. All rights reserved. Legal Policy