Where do we draw the line between art and nature? Does one shape the way we see the other or do they engage in a mutual dialogue? The examples of the picturesque garden at Stourhead and the garden mural at the villa of Livia demonstrate the degree of artifice that often goes into making nature look “natural.”
Both the garden at Stourhead and the garden fresco at the villa of Livia embrace the disorderliness of nature and stress the variety to be found in the natural world. What effects does this produce in the outdoor setting? In the indoor setting? Why do you think these particular elements might have appealed to their respective audiences?
One of these works attempts to bring an artistic aesthetic to an outdoor landscape, the other to bring a garden view to an interior space. Why? What is the relationship between art (or artifice) and nature in each case? How would you describe the relationship between art and nature in your own culture and era?
How does each of these works endow nature with intellectual as well as aesthetic value? Do you think that by attaching allegorical or symbolic associations to nature, we increase or decrease our aesthetic appreciation of it?