Teacher resources and professional development across the curriculum

Teacher professional development and classroom resources across the curriculum

Monthly Update sign up
Mailing List signup
Search
Follow The Annenberg Learner on LinkedIn Follow The Annenberg Learner on Facebook Follow Annenberg Learner on Twitter
MENU

Compare

American Marines Raising American Flag on Mount Suribachi, Iwo Jima
American Marines Raising American Flag on Mount Suribachi, Iwo Jima
Surrender of Breda
Surrender of Breda

When it comes to art, how do we define historical accuracy?

We often think of history painting in terms of events long past, but current events are also depicted in images, preserving a record for the future. The relationship between the actual event and the images that document them is always questionable, but even more so when there are living eyewitnesses to the scene portrayed. Both Rosenthal’s photograph from Iwo Jima and Velázquez’s Surrender of Breda visually powerful images that offer much simpler takes on actual history than those who lived through the events experienced.

back

Questions to Consider

  • Each of these images was created not long (relatively speaking) after the event depicted took place. How do you think an image created soon after an event might differ from one produced with greater hindsight? What would be the advantages and disadvantages of each?
  • How does each of these images relate to the event it depicts? What do you think was more important in each case—“accurate” documentation of the event in question or the conveyance of a specific message through the representation of the event? What does this suggest about the purpose each image was meant to serve? Do you think these images fulfilled their original functions?
  • Many people tend to think about photographs as more “realistic” or “true” to events than painting or other art forms. Do you think this is an accurate assessment? Why or why not?

© Annenberg Foundation 2014. All rights reserved. Legal Policy