|
Children's Ideas About Energy Flow in Communities
Below are common ideas children in grades K-6 have about this
topic, compiled from research on children's ideas about science
(see the Session 7 Children's Ideas Bibliography).
Consider what evidence might refute this idea, and why a child
would be
likely to believe this?
1. Interdependencies among life forms have a predetermined purpose.
|
|
In a community, food chains are a good example of interdependencies
among producers, consumers, and decomposers. Scientists
would argue that energy flow is a consequence of these interdependencies
rather than a pre-determined purpose. This is an example
of teleological thinking — where nature
or natural processes are considered to have a purpose or
design. Children and adults often try to attribute cause
in nature in
this way, often because of religious or cultural beliefs.
It’s
more a habit of mind to be addressed during lessons than
an idea to be countered by evidence. Hide
Response
|
2. Interdependencies among life forms are ultimately meant
to serve the needs of people.
3. Food is defined only as those things that animals eat.
4. Plants get their food from the soil.
5. Plants make food for the benefit of animals.
6. Energy is “formed” in biological processes rather
than changed or transferred.
7. Once eaten, the energy in food disappears.
8. Energy adds up through a food chain, giving top predators all
of the energy.
9. There are more individuals at the ends of food chains than at
the beginning.
10. The decomposers recycle energy.
|