|
Children's Ideas About Rocks
Below are common ideas children in grades K-6 have about this
topic, compiled from research on children's ideas about science (see the
Session 1 Children's Ideas Bibliography). Consider
what evidence might refute this idea, and why a child would be
likely to believe this?
1. Few children have well-developed ideas about how rocks form.
|
|
Rock can form in several ways: molten rock can cool to
become igneous rock, both at and beneath the Earth’s
surface; sediments weathered from rocks can settle out
of water or wind to form layers that, when compacted turn
into sedimentary rock; and finally, rocks that already
exist can undergo changes as a result of intense pressure
and high temperatures to become metamorphic rock. The processes
of rock formation are not part of children’s everyday
experience, and, with the exception of lava cooling to
form rock, take place over immense time periods. It is
challenging for children to be able to understand or visualize
what is unseen.Hide
Response
|
2. Sedimentary
rocks form when sediments stick together at the bottom
of a river. Heat may be involved.
3. Rocks are unchanging.
4. Some children think that rocks are formed in a few years; others
think that all rock has existed since the formation of the Earth.
5. Rocks form where they are found.
Bibliography:
Driver, R., et al. “Materials and Their Properties.” Leeds
National Curriculum Support Project, Part 3, Leeds City Council
and the University of Leeds, U.K. (1992).
Kusnick, J. “Growing Pebbles
and Conceptual Prisms: Understanding the Source of Student Misconceptions
about Rock Formations.” Journal
of Geoscience Education 50, no. 1 (2002): 31-39.
Russell, T., Bell,
D., Longden, K. and McGuigan, L. Rocks, Soil, and Weather: Primary
SPACE Project Research Report. Liverpool,
U.K.: Liverpool University Press, 1993.
Trend, R. “Conceptions of Geological
Time Among Primary Teacher Trainees with Reference to Their Engagement With
Geoscience, History, and Science.” International
Journal of Science Education 22, no. 5 (2000): 53-55.
|